Polish language / public sector / self-host

PLLuM

  • PLLuM‑4B and 12B v2.2 Apache 2.0

    Current base, instruct and chat variants (2512). For self-hosting and RAG.

  • PLLuM‑8B and 70B v2.2 Llama 3.1

    The same jobs, a different license. 70B is instruct and chat only.

The corpus is about 140 billion tokens. Older releases, including the 8x7B MoE, can be CC BY‑NC 4.0.

  • Verified2026-06-23
  • Models covered2
  • Sources4
  • Deployment channels3

Purchase decision (when to choose / when to avoid)

Choose if...

  • Polish quality, self-hosting and data control are the priorities.
  • You are building RAG or an assistant for public-sector, educational or domain documents.
  • You can evaluate the current 4B, 8B, 12B and 70B variants and select the appropriate license deliberately.

Avoid if...

  • You cannot review the exact model license; the family includes Apache 2.0, Llama 3.1 and older CC BY-NC 4.0 releases.
  • You need a turnkey SaaS product with user administration, SLA and per-seat billing.
  • Frontier coding, multimodality or complex reasoning are the main requirements.

Cost in practice (scenarios)

4B or 12B pilot

GPU infrastructure and operating cost; there is no single official API price for the family.

  • self-host
  • RAG or internal assistant
  • selected quantization and inference engine
70B deployment

Much higher memory and inference requirements; calculate against target traffic and SLA.

  • multi-GPU infrastructure
  • monitoring and MLOps team
These are estimates/scenarios (not an invoice). Actual cost depends on context length, number of users, limits and retention policies.

Deployment / data / enterprise

Deployment channels

  • Self-host from weights published by CYFRAGOVPL on Hugging Face
  • Deploy with an inference stack compatible with the selected architecture
  • Choose the current 4B, 8B, 12B or 70B variant according to resources and license

Data policy

Training on data
With self-hosting, data and any further tuning remain under the deployer's control.
Retention
Determined by the organization's self-hosted configuration.
Data residency
Full control with on-premises or selected Polish/European cloud infrastructure.
Model cards and the paper document architectures, corpus and alignment; verify the license per repository.

Enterprise readiness

Admin
Provided by the deploying organization.
SSO/SCIM
Provided by the selected platform or application.
Audit
Provided by infrastructure, application and logging layers.
DPA
Depends on infrastructure-provider agreements.
Certifications
Depends on hosting and deployment design.
The model offers control, but the enterprise operating layer must be built around it.

Best use cases

  • assistants and RAG systems working mainly with Polish documents
  • public administration, education and Polish-language research
  • organizations that want to host a Polish model on controlled infrastructure.

Strengths

  • A substantial Polish corpus, instruction and preference datasets, and a publicly documented development process.
  • Multiple model sizes and architectures allow deployment to be matched to infrastructure and workload.
  • The project includes output correction, filtering, safety evaluation and a public-administration prototype.

Weaknesses / risks

  • Licensing is not uniform; older variants marked '-nc' are not intended for commercial use.
  • The 70B variant requires costly infrastructure and MLOps expertise.
  • Polish specialization does not make the family a direct replacement for frontier models in complex reasoning, coding or multimodality.

Current models (examples)

  • PLLuM‑4B‑2512 and PLLuM‑12B‑2512 - current base, instruct and chat variants under Apache 2.0.
  • Llama‑PLLuM‑8B‑2512 and Llama‑PLLuM‑70B‑2512 - current Llama 3.1 variants; 8×7B and '-nc' models are earlier releases.

Alternatives (if this model doesn't fit)